What player have the Dodger signed or even traded for for that will be past there age prime during there contract? I keep hearing this argument and seeing nothing that suggests it's true. There is an argument to be made about some of the dollar figures but I really don't see the over the hill factor at all, with the exception maybe of Crawford. Here is ever major signing or trade acquired guy under the new regime (included Kemp because McCourt had to sign him to sell the team):YankeeManiac wrote:By the time he is with ya in 2014, he will fit the Dodger's "former star in the midst statistical regression that new team is willing to overspend for in hopes of player returning to former glory, so lets keep our fingers crossed" mold perfectly.Clown Baby wrote:2.8 Curtis Granderson OF "I wish I had Dodger Money" Yankees
Kemp - 28, Signed until 35
Grienke - 29, Signed until 34
Adrian Gonzalez - 30, Signed until 35
Ethier - 30, Signed until 35
Hanley - 29, Signed until 31
Beckett - 32, Signed until 34
Crawford - 31, Signed until 36
League - 29, Signed until 32
Puig - 22, Signed until 28
Ryu - 27, signed until 33
No guy signed past 36, there is no comparison to be made to the contracts of Pujols, Arod, Jeter and the sorts that were going to take them into there 40's.
bert 